Share “Washington Examiner: Tax on health...”

Washington Examiner: Tax on health insurance just another Obamacare surprise

Published: December 7, 2012
Advertisement

It was always understood that the federal government would have to create and operate exchanges in states that did not, but no one bothered to include a method for funding federal exchanges. Chalk it up to the hasty, “at-all-costs” legislative methods used to pass Obamacare in the spring of 2010. Democrats, having lost their Senate supermajority at that point, were forced to back a hastily drafted, porked-up Senate version of the bill through the House of Representatives without making changes they thought they'd eventually be able to make.

Whatever legal issues are involved in Obama's new health insurance tax, this provides yet one more example of how Obamacare's true costs will become known only over time. When the law was written and it said “no federal funds” after Jan. 1, 2015, that meant the exchanges would not impose any recurring costs on the federal government — or so the Congressional Budget Office thought.

So thanks for the heads up, former Speaker Pelosi. An anxious nation at least is braced for more bad news about Obamacare.

— The Washington Examiner


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    ONEOK Partners to invest up to $100 million to expand capacity in Permian Basin
  2. 2
    Report: Thunder signs Josh Huestis to 4-year deal
  3. 3
    Thunder TV analyst Nancy Lieberman expected to become Kings assistant coach
  4. 4
    Dodgers send Olivera to Braves in three-way trade
  5. 5
    MTV's 'Real World' sets casting call in Oklahoma City
+ show more

FEATURED JOBS



× Trending opinion Article