Water works: Ill-timed veto might backfire on Bush

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board Published: September 26, 2007
Advertisement
;
Th
e White House says there's too much spending being authorized and that a number of projects are outside the purview of the federal government. White House officials contend "fiscal irresponsibility” should be addressed when it surfaces.

But the administration's ability to fend off ill-conceived spending later on will be weakened if the president's veto — premature in Inhofe's opinion — is overwhelmingly overridden.

There's no question the water bill contains money for important projects. As Casteel reports, Inhofe got $30 million included to complete relocation of Tar Creek-area residents, as well as a provision that would save Edmond $10 million in its Arcadia Lake dispute with the Corps of Engineers.

The real issue is keeping worthy projects on track while weeding out those of questionable merit, an effort Inhofe believes will be hampered by an early, unsuccessful veto. We think he's right.


by The Oklahoman Editorial Board
The Oklahoman Editorial Board consists of Gary Pierson, President and CEO of The Oklahoma Publishing Company; Christopher P. Reen, president and publisher of The Oklahoman; Kelly Dyer Fry, editor and vice president of news; Christy Gaylord...
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Colorado Is Consuming Way More Pot Than Anyone Ever Believed
  2. 2
    What Dan Gilbert said to LeBron James to get him to return to Cleveland
  3. 3
    Female Yahoo Exec Sued By a Female Employee for Sexual Harassment
  4. 4
    A company wants you to experiment on Facebook — by quitting
  5. 5
    LeBron's face vandalized on Miami mural that took 2+ years to create
+ show more