Oklahoma House passes voter identification bill in party-line vote

By The Associated Press
Published: March 10, 2008

OKLAHOMA CITY - The Oklahoma House passed legislation Monday that would require Oklahomans to show photo identification before they could vote in spite of objections from opponents who said the requirement creates a new obstacle to the right to vote and is unconstitutional.
Advertisement

The House approved the bill 55-42 along party lines following an hour-long debate in which Republicans said it would restore the public's faith in the state's voting process and Democrats said it would disenfranchise voters who commonly do not have IDs, including the elderly and minorities.

"Your fundamental right to vote has now been abridged," said Rep. Scott Inman, D-Oklahoma City. "It is fundamentally unfair to a number of Oklahomans in this state."

"We are asking to put this hurdle, this obstacle, in the way of voters," said Rep. Ryan Kiesel, D-Seminole. Kiesel said there is no evidence the bill will stop voter fraud but it will make it harder to vote, discouraging more Oklahomans from voting.

"Don't take away our right to vote," said Rep. Ed Cannaday, D-Porum.

The measure's author, Rep. Sue Tibbs, R-Tulsa, said the bill was designed to stop voter fraud in Oklahoma elections and was not an attempt to prevent people from voting.

Tibbs said election officials have discovered a variety of discrepancies in prior elections, including votes cast by dead people and others whose homes had been destroyed by fire.

In one recent election, precinct workers collected 2,615 provisional ballots but only 201 were actually counted because the rest were not registered and were ineligible to vote, she said.

The bill allows eight forms of photo identification including an Oklahoma driver's license, identification cards issued by the Department of Public Safety or a federally recognized Indian tribe, a U.S. passport, military and student identification cards and debit or credit cards with photos of the user.

"It's a minor inconvenience for a small percentage of voters," Tibbs said of the measure.

But Rep. Al Lindley, D-Oklahoma City, compared the requirement to an illegal poll tax because some of the IDs cost money to obtain.

Rep. John Wright, R-Broken Arrow, said the government should demand a measure of responsibility from citizens in order to restore confidence in the process.

"It's about the confidence that the people have that the process is one of integrity," said Rep. Trebor Worthen, R-Oklahoma City.

"There's no right to be convenient," said Rep. Dan Sullivan, R-Tulsa. Sullivan said Oklahomans are asked to show a photo ID each time they board a commercial airplane, cash a check or walk into a federal courthouse.

"It is not too much to ask," he said.

State election officials have said that a photo ID requirement at polling places will create long lines and additional delays on election day.

State Election Board Secretary Michael Clingman has said implementing the measure will cost $90,000 per election to pay for more than 1,000 more precinct officials to check voter's photo IDs and try to avoid delays in voting.

If passed by the Senate and signed into law, Oklahoma will join 22 other states that have adopted similar voter ID requirements, Tibbs said.

"It's proven to be OK," she said. The House approved a similar measure last year that stalled in the Senate.

The measure is House Bill 2956.

Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford
Bookmark and Share





Comments

Leave a comment. Log in below or sign up (it's free).

   
This will greatly affect the Democrat's ability to rig elections. They won't be able to have people vote multiple times using dead people and other names. No wonder they are fighting it so hard. Oklahoma Democrats are not as dirty as their national friends, so this fight is probably being pushed by Howard "Arrghhh" Dean to stop this national trend.
Patriot, Edmond - Mar 17, 2008 9:04 AM
Report: Offensive language
Next, I hope the legislature funds a project to clean all the dead people and non-existent names off the roles!
c, Oklahoma City - Mar 11, 2008 12:35 PM
Report: Offensive language
"...Democrats said it would disenfranchise voters who commonly do not have IDs, including the elderly and minorities." Please, the ones that are saying this haven't produced a single voter that's being "disfranchised". Honestly, who doesn't have some form of picture ID? You have to have picture ID if you get on a plane, write a check, often asked for it when using a debit/credit card etc. Since several acceptable forms of ID are acceptable, some at no cost, the "poll tax" argument is moot. It is extremely easy to vote early and often in Oklahoma. Have been voting here for over 20 years and not ONCE have I been asked for my voter registration card or ID (always take them with me). The potential for fraud is definitely there, and am sure it does exist (they claim we don't have hardly any because you would have to catch them in the act, if you dont ask for ID, how are you going to catch them? Absurd! As long as you can read upside down, you can look over the shoulder of the person in front of you and pick a name off the list. Its extremely easy to do (never done it) but as long as the poll worker doesn't know the the person who's name you picked, you can go all around town, from precinct to precinct.
Larry, Oklahoma City - Mar 11, 2008 5:21 AM
Report: Offensive language
The right to vote is to be extended to every American, with no exception to wealth or status. Determining if a person is a registered voter is incumbent upon the state, not the voter. If ONE voter is kept from participating in this, the most sacred of our liberties, then the price of this bill is too high.
Chebon, Norman - Mar 10, 2008 10:14 PM
Report: Offensive language
Things you do everyday that require a picture id....use VISA debit at Target....purchase a 6 pack of beer.....cash a check at YOUR bank.....and it's too much to ask voters to prove they are who they say they are before they elect the most important office of the United States?......I think not!
Philip, Oklahoma City - Mar 10, 2008 9:43 PM
Report: Offensive language
you can't even cash a payroll check without a picture ID why all the fuss we should show our ID when voting
tony, burns flat - Mar 10, 2008 8:23 PM
Report: Offensive language
Excellent!!! It may actually speed up the voting process because precinct workers can use the ID's to help find our names on the role.
James, Owasso - Mar 10, 2008 8:22 PM
Report: Offensive language
Go figure. Democrats fighting something that brings integrity to the mix. (rolleyes) The more things change, the more things stay the same.
Brock, Beaver - Mar 10, 2008 7:35 PM
Report: Offensive language
How does this cause a problem? Passport, Driver's License, ID Card? People whine way too much.
Cletus, Mayberry - Mar 10, 2008 7:34 PM
Report: Offensive language
Voting history has proven that there is some amount of fraud. If there is a law that prevents even one person that votes that is not registered compliant, then the law is just and helps to prevent one fraudulent vote from canceling the vote of a legitimate voter.
Tom, Edmond - Mar 10, 2008 10:35 PM
Report: Offensive language